1. What is this mashup trying to communicate? Is it technical experiment, social or political commentary, a comedic parody, or an abstract work of media art?
I believe that this mashup is trying to communicate that if you try, you can create a new and interesting song just by mixing songs together. I think that it encourages people to try some new things with songs because you'll never know what you'll get. This mashup is an abstract work of media art because it doesn't seem to be saying anything in particular. I believe that this was created just for fun and entertainment so it would not be anything serious.2. Did its creator follow or break copyright laws in its production?
I believe that the creator followed the copyright laws in its production because they did not claim the song to be theirs. They even named it a mashup and so I believe they have no intention of taking credit for the songs. Also, the creator is known for creating mashups of songs and soo everone already knows that the songs created by this creator are usually just mashups of original songs by other singers.
3. Do you think that mashup like this requires copyright permission? Why or why not.
Yes, I think that this mashups like this requires copyright permission because sometimes when the songs are editted so much, people can't tell which song is which. The creator would be taking songs that belong to other people so advertise and promote their own and so I believe copyright permission is required. This song would be used for a television show and so anything that would be publicly revealed like that should require copyright permission.
No comments:
Post a Comment